Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDrinnon, Joy
dc.contributor.authorBrannock, David
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-27T12:52:42Z
dc.date.available2020-07-27T12:52:42Z
dc.date.issued2020-07
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11558/5138
dc.description.abstractThe main purpose of this systematic review was to compare the effectiveness of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in children and adolescents who experienced trauma. Empirical studies suggest both treatment methods are effective in alleviating trauma in adults, so this review examined the efficacy of EMDR and CBT in minors. A secondary question was to compare these two methods in treating depression, which often accompanies posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). From electronic databases (Milligan OneSearch and Google Scholar), six studies of randomized controlled trials from 2004-2017 were identified. Four theoretical articles and six meta-analyses were included for background information. The results showed both EMDR and CBT are highly effective in treating trauma in children and adolescents. Neither method reduced PTSD distress significantly better than the other. EMDR was slightly more efficient in lessening traumatic symptoms. CBT was slightly more effective in reducing depression.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectEye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR)en_US
dc.subjectCognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)en_US
dc.subjectPost-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)en_US
dc.subjectChildrenen_US
dc.subjectAdolescentsen_US
dc.subjectTraumaen_US
dc.subjectDepressionen_US
dc.titleEffectiveness of EMDR and CBT in Children and Adolescents with Traumaen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Milligan

© Milligan University. All Rights Reserved.